Teaching by principles - COGNITIVE PRINCIPLES
There are twelve
overarching principles of second language learning that interact with sound
practice and on which your teaching can be based. These principles form the
core of an approach to language teaching, as discussed in previous chapter.
A.
COGNITIVE PRINCIPLES
This principles called “cognitive” because
they relate mainly to mental and intellectual functions.
Principle 1: Automatically
We commonly attribute
children’s success to their widely observed tendency to acquire language
subconsciously; that is, without overtly analysing the forms of language
themselves. Through an inductive process of exposure to language input and
opportunity to experiment with output, they appear to learn languages without
“thinking” about them.
This childlike, subconscious
processing is similar to what Barry McLaughlin called automatic processing with peripheral attention to language
forms. That is, in order to manage the incredible complexity and quantity of
language—the vast numbers of processing language unit by unit, piece by piece,
focusing closely on each and “graduate” to a form of high-speed, automatic
processing in which language forms (words, affixes, word order, rules, etc.)
are only on the periphery of attention. Children usually make this transition
faster than adults, who tend to linger in analytical, controlled modes,
focusing on the bits and pieces into the hard drive of their minds.
-
Subconscious absorption of language through
meaningful use.
-
Efficient and rapid movement away from a focus
on the forms of language to a focus on the purposes to which language is put.
-
Resistance to the temptation to analyse
language forms.
The principle of
Automaticity may be stated as follows:
Efficient second language learning involves a timely movement of the control of a few language forms into the automatic processing of a relatively unlimited number of language forms. Overanalysing language, thinking too much about its forms, and consciously lingering on rules of language all tend to impede this graduation.
Notice that this principle
does not say that focus on language forms is necessary harmful. Because in
fact, adults can be benefit from certain focal processing of rules, definitions
and other formal aspects of language. What the principle does say is that
adults can take a lesson from children by speedily overcoming our propensity to
pay too much focal attention to the bits and pieces of language and to move
language forms quickly to the periphery by using language in authentic context
for meaningful purposes., In so doing, automaticity is built more efficiently.
Below are some possibilities might mean to us
as a teacher:
-
Because classroom learning normally begins
with controlled, focal processing, there is no mandate to entirely avoid overt
attention to language systems (grammar, phonology, discourse, etc.). That
attention, however, should stop well short of blocking students from achieving
a more automatic, fluent grasp of the language. Therefore, grammatical
explanations or exercises dealing with what is sometimes called “usage” have a
place in the adult classroom, but you could overwhelm your students with
grammar. If they become too heavily-centered on the formal aspects of language,
such processes can block pathways to fluency.
-
Make sure that a large proportion of your
lessons are focused on the “use” of language for purposes that are as genuine
as a classroom context will permit. Students will gain more language
competences in the long run if the functional purposes of language are the
focal point.
-
Automaticity isn’t gained overnight;
therefore, you need to exercise patience with students as you slowly help them
to achieve fluency.
Principle 2: Meaningful Learning
This is the close related to
the Principle of Automaticity, which convincingly argue the strength of
meaningful as opposed to rote learning. Meaningful learning “subsumes” new
information into existing structure and memory systems, and the resulting
associative links create stronger retention. Rote learning has little chance of
creating long-term retention.. Children are good meaningful acquirers because
they associate sounds, words, structure and discourse elements with that which
is relevant and important in their daily quest for knowledge and survival.
The principle of Meaningful Learning is quite simply stated:
Meaningful learning will lead toward better long-term retention than rote learning
The language classroom has
not always been the best place for meaningful learning. In the days when the
ALM was popular, rote learning occupied too much of the class hour as students
were drilled and drilled in attempt to “overlearn” language forms. The
principle of Meaningful Learning tells us that some aural-oral drilling is
appropriate.
Some
classroom implications of the Principle of Meaningful Learning:
-
Capitalize on the power of meaningful learning
by appealing to students’ interests, academic goals and career goals.
-
Whenever a few topic or concepts is
introduced, attempt to another it in students’ existing knowledge and
background so that it becomes associated with something they already know.
-
Avoid the pitfalls of rote learning:
a. Too much grammar
explanation
b. Too many abstract
principles and theories
c. Too much drilling
and/or memorization
d. Activities whose
purpose are not clear
e. Activities that
do not contribute to accomplishing the goals of the lesson, unit or course
f. Technique that
are so mechanical or tricky that students’ focuses on the mechanics instead of
on the language meanings.
Principle 3: The Anticipation of Reward
According to Skinner, the anticipation of reward is
the most powerful factor in directing one’s behaviour. The principle behind the
Skinner’s operant conditioning paradigm, which I term the Reward Principle, can
be stated as follows:
Human beings are universally driven to act, or “behave,” by the anticipation of some sort of reward—tangible or intangible, short term or long term—that will ensue as a result of the behaviour.
This behoves you to help
students to see clearly why they are doing something and its relevance to their
long-term goals in learning English. Also, a reward driven ultimately have a
high impact on classroom instruction.
Conditioning rewards
can:
-
Lead learners to become dependent on
short-term rewards.
-
Coax them into a habit of looking to teachers
and others for their only rewards.
-
Forestall the development of their own internally
administered, intrinsic system of rewards.
Considering all side of Reward Principle, the
following constructive classroom implications may be drawn:
-
Provide an optimal degree of immediate verbal
praise and encouragement to them as a form of short-term reward (just enough to
keep them confident in their ability but not so much that your praise simply
becomes verbal gush).
-
Encourage students to reward each other with
compliments and supportive actin.
-
In classes with very low motivation,
short0term reminders of progress may help students to perceive their
development. Gold stars and stickers (especially for young learners), issuing
certain “privileges” for good work, and progress chart and graphs may spark
some interest.
-
Display enthusiasm and excitement yourself in
the classroom. If you are dull, lifeless, bored, and have low energy, you can
be almost sure that it will be contagious.
-
Try to get learners to see the long-term
rewards in learning English by pointing out what they can do with English where
they live and around the world, the prestige in being able to use English, the
academic benefits of knowing English, jobs that require English and so on.
-
Principle 4: Intrinsic Motivation
Simply stated, the Intrinsic Motivation
Principle is:
The most powerful rewards are those that are intrinsically motivated within the learner. Because the behaviour stems from needs, wants, or desires within oneself, the behaviour itself is self-rewarding: therefore, no externally administered reward is necessary.
Classroom techniques have a
much greater chance for success if they are self-rewarding in the perception of
the learner. The development of intrinsic motivation does indeed involve
affective processing, as most of these first five principles do, and so the
argument is appropriate. But reward-directed behaviour in all organisms is
complex to the point that cognitive, physical, and affective processing are
involved.
Principle 5: Strategic Investment
Principle of Strategic
Investment can be called:
Successful mastery of the second language will be due to a large extent to a learner’s own personal “investment” of time, effort, and attention to the second language in the form of an individualized battery of strategies for comprehending and producing the language.
This principle is laid out
in where practical classroom applications are made. For the time being,
however, ponder two major pedagogical implications of the principle are:
-
The importance of recognizing and dealing with
the wide variety of styles and strategies that learners successfully bring to
the learning process.
-
The need for attention to each separate
individual in the classroom.
The principle of strategic
investment nevertheless is a reminder to provide as much attention as you can
to each individual student. Some aspects of the dilemma surrounding variation
and the need for individualization can be solved through specific strategies-based
instruction, which will be shown below:
-
Am I seizing whatever opportunity I can to let
learners in on the ‘secrets” to develop and use strategies for learning and
communication?
-
Do my lessons and impromptu feedback
adequately sensitize students to the wisdom of their taking responsibility for
their own learning?
-
How can I ensure that my students will want to
put forth the effort of trying out some strategies?
0 Response to "Teaching by principles - COGNITIVE PRINCIPLES"
Silahkan tinggalkan komentar di sini. - Please, leave a comment here.